• Fill out the form below and I'll send you my special report, Fat Loss Secrets Exposed, absolutely free.

    :
    :
  •  

When You SHOULD Terminate Your Sets

Posted by Joel Marion

In Part I of our discussion on training to failure, I asked you a question:

“When do YOU terminate your sets?”

In the comments section of that post, you responded.

The consensus?

There wasn’t one. I mean, not even close.

Replies ranged from the very conservative “when the speed of movement slows down” (which I think is bogus, and I’ll provide my thoughts in another post) to the much more extreme use of “forced” reps (having a spotter assist you to complete more repetitions, as “the kid” from my previous story reluctantly had me do for him) on a regular basis.

Needless to say, due to the wide range of replies, this is an area that is an area that most here could use some clarification on, and that’s exactly what I plan to give you over these next few posts.

For today, I promised to share with you what I feel to be the ideal point of termination for your sets, but first let’s make sure we’re all on the same page.

What is “failure”?

While fairly self-explanatory, the term “failure” does indeed carry quite a bit of ambiguity within the bodybuilding and fitness communities.

For simplicity’s sake, let’s define failure in terms of completed repetitions.

If you complete a repetition (in good form), you succeed (at completing that repetition, thus no failure occurs). If you do not complete the repetition (again, in good form), you fail.

This is failure.

Some strength coaches will try to tell you that if you barely complete the last repetition of a given set and would not be able to perform any subsequent repetitions, you have trained that set to failure. This is distorting the English language.

When did you fail? You didn’t.

Simply put, you fail when you attempt something and do not succeed.

With that said, here’s my “general” recommendation on set termination:

If you will be unable to complete the next repetition in near perfect form, terminate the set.

In other words, avoid failure.

Why?

Simply put, attempting to move a load (in an already hyper-fatigued state) and having to set it back down because you are unable to lift it again is extremely taxing on a central nervous system, which is the major cause of overtraining.

The harder you push, the more damage you do to your CNS, and the less effective your workouts become. Not only that, but before you know it you’ll be feeling like s#%t, too.

A winning combo, I know.

Bring on the skipped workouts, inconsistency, and lack of progress!

There’s no way around it: abuse your central nervous system with true “failure” training day in and day out, and you’re pretty much guaranteed to fail altogether.

That said, notice I prefaced my recommendation by saying it was a general recommendation.

Do I ever train to failure? Yep. And when used “intelligently”, failure training can yield exceptional results.

At least 120 comments and I’ll share a bunch of “intelligent” methods with you tomorrow.

Until then, train to succeed.

Joel


  • WHAT’S NEXT?

    • Post a comment!


    • Share this post! Share this post easily via Facebook, Twitter, Email or any social bookmarking site using the above uber widget!


    • Get FREE stuff! Get my Fat Loss Secrets Exposed report and a bunch of other free stuff when you subscribe to this blog at the top of the page!
  •  

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
92 comments - add yours
Reply  |  Quote

Really? Wow. so I dont have to force myself to complete those last reps when it gets toooo hard?? SWWEEEEETTT :)

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Bernice
Really? Wow. so I dont have to force myself to complete those last reps when it gets toooo hard?? SWWEEEEETTT :)

You should be training intensely, and you should be working hard to complete as many reps in good form as you can (this takes concentration, mental focus, and intense effort). That said, when you can no longer complete reps with good form, or if you are finding that you are often attempting reps that you can’t complete (by yourself), you’ve reached diminishing returns.

Train hard,

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

i do a planned amount of sets so if i up my reps to max i would probably fail before i finished all my sets

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By ian
i do a planned amount of sets so if i up my reps to max i would probably fail before i finished all my sets

Meaning you wouldn’t get the prescribed number of reps on each subsequent set? If so, that isn’t as important (when training for hypertrophy anyway), but we’ll discuss this some more tomorrow.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

I train with fairly light weights (3kgs – 5kgs for upper body and 5kg – 30kgs for lower body) but my max reps are 20 x 3 sets. I’m not sure it yields results.. but psychologically – if i terminate the sets because i had increased the weights and it’s too hard for me to do it in the correct form, I feel I haven’t worked out properly for the day!

Reply  |  Quote

I agree with your idea of failure and have found that if I train to failure on all my sets I battle to do my workout properly, not to mention the headache I get afterwards.I normaly train until until I know that I will not be able to complete the final rep properly

Reply  |  Quote

I lose good form considerably before I “fail” (completely CANNOT do it). So in a sense I could say that I terminate when my form fails. I’m still trying to figure out just how to determine this, particularly on my weakest areas (biceps, for example). I do go beyond absolute perfection in my form, but hopefully stop before I’m off enough that I’m doing damage.

Reply  |  Quote

Every now and then I like to terrorize myself and perform one humungous workout that goes like this: For a chest day I do incline dumbell presses (and that’s all). I do at least 10 sets, starting with 50Kg dumbs. I usually fail before the tenth rep. I rest for about 45 seconds and then grab the 47.5 kg dumbs. I go to failure, rest, then grab the 45kg dumbs. By the time I get down to 30kg’s I am flat out doing 12 reps. I go to positive failure on each set, but never negative failure. It’s a workout that hurts but it is fun and it gets results. Within a week I can push the 50′s again.

Reply  |  Quote

Bogus is a bit of a harsh word, I am anxious to see your argument. There are a lot of very reputable and proven trainers who feel that tempo change is failure. There are a lot that do not also, but you seemed like you felt pretty strongly against it (as if it wasn’t a valid point of view).

Reply  |  Quote

Seeing your explanation of failure i suppose i haven’t done that for a year or so now. I tend to push until i know the next rep will either be a failed rep or extremely close to one. i would think that whether you train to failure or not would also be dependant on the frequency of training per muscle group.

Reply  |  Quote

I agree with KB and as I said earlier if you know that next rep is toast don’t even try it. I believe it puts you in overload.

Reply  |  Quote

Given your definition, and I agree, it’s also agiven that the dividing line between knowing the last successful rep and the next unsuccesful attempt, i.e. failure, can be pretty thin, and we may not always get it right. 2 or 3 short of failure seems a better bet to me

Reply  |  Quote

It sounds like some of you need to pick up a copy of the “Poliquin Principles” or Charles Staley’s “EDT” (to name just a couple). These programs can offer tons of advice. I don’t believe you can go wrong with quality trainers like this.

Reply  |  Quote

I have to admit, I’m finding it frustrating to only get a tiny piece of info on this subject every day. So, I will wait until tomorrow for another tiny bit…

On another subject, I found the biggest block for me (a woman) to becoming really fit is that there is a benefit to having a body that is ugly from fat and poor muscle tone, which is that it provides great protection from being noticed by men, which, believe it or not, is not something I want, and sometimes downright scary. Changing my body was simple and quick once I had accurate nutrition info and info on how to work out properly without injuring myself; overcoming the attachment to the protection of being invisible is much, much harder.

Reply  |  Quote

Sinde I rarely have a spotter (home gym), I use post-failure reps infrequently. However, when I am “peaking” and planning a period of active (or straight-up slothful) recovery, I occasionally go b@lls-to the-wall using the following:
- After benches, pushups.
- After dips and chins, JUMP back up and perform negatives.
- After squats, body-weight jumps.

Reply  |  Quote

I will usually just try to guess when I can’t complete the next rep… but my question is for push-ups. I am working on increasing my full (not knee) reps. I can do 4-5 now (to failure), which is so much less than the knee version. But that feels so wimpy, so I’ll rest (usually lying flat on the floor panting!) then try again to failure 2-3 more times. Or, I’ll just switch in the plank position to putting my knees down. Never sure what is best.

Reply  |  Quote

i agree. training to failure is a good tool that shouldn’t be overused.

Reply  |  Quote

When I was doing SuperSlow (one set to complete absolute failure, at a 10/10 tempo), I couldn’t always tell when I’d fail on the next rep. Sometimes I thought I would, and still completed two more (plus a little). Sometimes I thought I wouldn’t, but did.

So how am I supposed to know when the next rep would fail?

Reply  |  Quote

When I train to failure I stop one rep short. If I know I can not complete another rep, in good form, then I stop altogether. When I do move to a High Intensity Training program (HIT) the idea is to train to failure on your third, and final, set. (There are many versions of this program out there, and this is not the only interpretation.) I think this is using it relatively intelligently. The training is intense, and I think it should be. Am I correct in this line of thinking?

Reply  |  Quote

Joel; I’ve been reading your articles for a while now. I’ve always trained in groups, back, biceps, & chest, triceps, ext. I’ll stop the rep when i feel that i’m struggling to hard, or over compensating my form. my question is, am I taking the rep to far?

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel,
When I do shoulder presses, I find my ability varies from session to session. I typically do 5-6 reps per set for four sets – all with the same weight. If I can just barely perform a rep, then I stop at that point. I agree with you, it feels wrong to me to do a set when I know I won’t be able to finish it.
– Jeff

Reply  |  Quote

Failure can be both absolute or relative to the goal at hand. If the goal is to move the weight through a whole ROM and you cant, you failed. However, if the goal is to move 70% of your 1RM five times with fast bar speed and you cant, you have failed as well. Failure is relative to your goal, not a dictionary term. So why not scratch sets and reps and just try to achieve a certain number of quality reps only regardless how heavy the weight is. Therefore you can see 24 reps on your chart versus 4×6, 8×3, 3×8 or whatever. The only thing a relatively experienced lifter would need to know is what % of 1RM they are supposed to use. Train heavy, lift fast, grow huge. This is very different for newbies and advanced people though due to CNS concerns, so we need to know what population we are talking about as well. I understand that pushing through challenges is necessary, but most guys fall NUMEROUS reps short of their intended goals anyway and OVERTRAIN and PLATEAU – the ememies of your goals. Looking forward to hearing your suggestions Joel.

Reply  |  Quote

Joel,
I do not buy your reply “when the speed of movement slows down” (which I think is bogus,
As slowing is only the 1st part of the equation, it is a signal to tune into your form so that as soon as it breaks down more than slightly terminate the set as you have reached failure

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel my name is Mario from Venezuela. I´m 39 years old. thank you for yours advices and intelligent and logical point of view. i have a reflection:
You said training to failure often is good but in the mayority of cases its not good because forces our CNS and our recovery wont be ok. Is that you meaning? But here comes my question: Muscles dont grow after a stimulus? such a breakdown while we training those muscles? and that breakdown dont come with proper stimulus, I mean, heavy weights and forced reps? By forced reps I meaning those that requires an additional push of your body, not common. ( Excuse my english if i dont explain me very well) Thank you

Reply  |  Quote

Joel,

I like your definition on “failure”. But I have a question:

Let’s say my program said I have to do 8 reps. If I can do 8 reps just fine, should I do one or two more reps

1. if I can still do in good form
2. even if I can’t do in good form ( rest-pause, forced reps, cheat, dropsets comes into mind)
3. Or just stop at 8 reps and increase weight next time?

And I’m still waiting on your take on “pre-exhaust” :-)

Reply  |  Quote

Just want to add something to my comment above, if my program said I have to do 8 reps and I can only do 6 reps and can’t do another 2 reps in good form

1. Should I just stop it at 6 reps ? ( seems like it is what you meant in the above post )

2. Or should I continue to “squeeze” out another 1 or 2 reps ( via all those ways I mentioned above?)

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel ~ I’m a 60 year-old man with Muscular Dystrophy (NON-wheelchair) and I’ve been working out for almost 9 years. My neuro-muscular problem is in the peripheral nerves (elbows to fingertips, knees to toes). I’ve always gone to failure and sometimes I do a few forced reps. I used to be a big fat guy (over 300 lbs.). I’ve lost almost all my excess weight, but my progress in building muscle has been stalled for a long time. Do you think my neuro problems are stymying my efforst to build more muscle? Perhaps I shouldn’t ever go to failure. I’m eager to hear your comments.
Many thanks ~ Conway…

Reply  |  Quote

I love reading your suggestions…it gets me fired up for my workouts!

Thank you! :-)

Reply  |  Quote

There are only 2 accurate measures of intensity
0% effort where no work is being done and 100% effort
where one more rep has you breaking form and heaving and hoing the weight
and since it is unknown excatly what % is
required to stimulate a growth response it is only logical
to go to 100% when trying to trigger growth however going to failure
is to be used sparingly on only the last set of an exercise
you really have to know your exercise tolerance level
to learn how much is too much effort and frequency
for you but it is abundantly clear that muscle won’t grow
and get stronger unless you give it a very strong reason to
and then allow it enough time before the next workout to
fully recover and then grow.
these are the basic laws of muscle growth above all others.

Reply  |  Quote

hi i always take all my reps to failure,except when i have a very physical day at work as i work in the construction industry ,and some times i just cannot make it through some routines.But last week i took a few days off at the gym and when i returned i had an amazing workout

Reply  |  Quote

As Mike Mentzer would say if training to failure, even with one set you need to give sufficient time to recover, and depending on the person this can take, from the thousands of people he trained, 2 days to weeks.

Maybe you should read the Article “Understanding Recovery: A wound healing model” by Dave Staplin in which he states that for all steps to recovery to take place can take up to 6 weeks.

Reply  |  Quote

@Matt – …where did he mention anything about tempo change? That wasn’t even mentioned; unless I’m blind. Please point it out to me if I’m wrong…

Reply  |  Quote

Muscle failure from a biological view is when the golgi tendon organ will cause “weightlifting failure” to protect the muscle and tendons from excessive force. You push, but your arms are lowing the weight all the same. Not many people train to failure even the so called experts. This is the true essence of weight training failure and as you mentioned is beneficial in certain weight training regimes.

However, as we all know go hard go heavy and do the basics. Forget the fancy complicated mumbo jumbo around exercising that do little to nothing for getting results.

Reply  |  Quote

@Lucky

Hey lucky, tell it like it is. If your goal is to get bigger muscles you need overload, rest plus calories. Good comment.

Reply  |  Quote

I agree with your comments and appreciate them although I thought I would make a comment. Not everyone is capable to know exactly when failure or last rep before failure is coming unless you are a very healthy person. Due to different medical conditions sometimes you just know your limits from experience, others need to test their bodies or have someone help them. I thought I would make this comment as it is often assumed everyone is healthy and fit without limitatons. I am suggesting some need to learn their limititations and work with their bodies. Reps can vary on them.

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Selene
I lose good form considerably before I “fail” (completely CANNOT do it). So in a sense I could say that I terminate when my form fails. I’m still trying to figure out just how to determine this, particularly on my weakest areas (biceps, for example). I do go beyond absolute perfection in my form, but hopefully stop before I’m off enough that I’m doing damage.

Doesn’t have to be perfect, but should still be in good form. Sounds like you have a good approach.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Matt
Bogus is a bit of a harsh word, I am anxious to see your argument. There are a lot of very reputable and proven trainers who feel that tempo change is failure. There are a lot that do not also, but you seemed like you felt pretty strongly against it (as if it wasn’t a valid point of view).

I’ll give more detail later, but a decrease in the speed of movement tends to happen several reps before concentric failure…far before maximal motor units are recruited.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By dimitra
I have to admit, I’m finding it frustrating to only get a tiny piece of info on this subject every day. So, I will wait until tomorrow for another tiny bit…

Patience is a virtue :)

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Tane
I will usually just try to guess when I can’t complete the next rep… but my question is for push-ups. I am working on increasing my full (not knee) reps. I can do 4-5 now (to failure), which is so much less than the knee version. But that feels so wimpy, so I’ll rest (usually lying flat on the floor panting!) then try again to failure 2-3 more times. Or, I’ll just switch in the plank position to putting my knees down. Never sure what is best.

Google Pavel’s “ladder” approach to increasing push up numbers…should be helpful!

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Seth
When I was doing SuperSlow (one set to complete absolute failure, at a 10/10 tempo), I couldn’t always tell when I’d fail on the next rep. Sometimes I thought I would, and still completed two more (plus a little). Sometimes I thought I wouldn’t, but did.

So how am I supposed to know when the next rep would fail?

It should be something that you “feel”…you should know based on the how hard the last completed rep was.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Matt
When I train to failure I stop one rep short.

If you stop one rep short, then you are not training to failure.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By John
Joel; I’ve been reading your articles for a while now. I’ve always trained in groups, back, biceps, & chest, triceps, ext. I’ll stop the rep when i feel that i’m struggling to hard, or over compensating my form. my question is, am I taking the rep to far?

Sound like a good approach to terminated a set; however, your groupings could use some work…I’ll talk about push/pull splits in another post (not the best way to set things up).

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Jamie Vanderheyden
Failure can be both absolute or relative to the goal at hand. If the goal is to move the weight through a whole ROM and you cant, you failed. However, if the goal is to move 70% of your 1RM five times with fast bar speed and you cant, you have failed as well. Failure is relative to your goal, not a dictionary term. So why not scratch sets and reps and just try to achieve a certain number of quality reps only regardless how heavy the weight is. Therefore you can see 24 reps on your chart versus 4×6, 8×3, 3×8 or whatever. The only thing a relatively experienced lifter would need to know is what % of 1RM they are supposed to use. Train heavy, lift fast, grow huge. This is very different for newbies and advanced people though due to CNS concerns, so we need to know what population we are talking about as well. I understand that pushing through challenges is necessary, but most guys fall NUMEROUS reps short of their intended goals anyway and OVERTRAIN and PLATEAU – the ememies of your goals. Looking forward to hearing your suggestions Joel.

It’s an interesting concept; I like it. I stress maintaining volume while upping intensity, so this approach would work well for those purposes.

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Pine
Joel,

I like your definition on “failure”. But I have a question:

Let’s say my program said I have to do 8 reps. If I can do 8 reps just fine, should I do one or two more reps

1. if I can still do in good form
2. even if I can’t do in good form ( rest-pause, forced reps, cheat, dropsets comes into mind)
3. Or just stop at 8 reps and increase weight next time?

And I’m still waiting on your take on “pre-exhaust” :-)

Time to increase the weight!

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Pine
Just want to add something to my comment above, if my program said I have to do 8 reps and I can only do 6 reps and can’t do another 2 reps in good form

1. Should I just stop it at 6 reps ? ( seems like it is what you meant in the above post )

Yes.

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By vicki rogers
I love reading your suggestions…it gets me fired up for my workouts!

Thank you! :-)

Awesome, Vicki! Thanks for your feedback!

Joel

Reply  |  Quote

I really like what you have mentioned in this post. I do my workouts without a partner and more often than not, i stop when my mind tells me that i have put in my best effort and cannot do another rep with proper form….

Reply  |  Quote

When talking about hypertrophy, finishing a set with awful form reps lets fewer energy in the tank to keep congesting the muscle. I totally agree with your failure approach.

How does your periodization between non-failure and failure periods looks Joel. It’ll be interesting to incorporate “shocking weeks” to my workouts.

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Conway
Hi Joel ~ I’m a 60 year-old man with Muscular Dystrophy (NON-wheelchair) and I’ve been working out for almost 9 years. My neuro-muscular problem is in the peripheral nerves (elbows to fingertips, knees to toes). I’ve always gone to failure and sometimes I do a few forced reps. I used to be a big fat guy (over 300 lbs.). I’ve lost almost all my excess weight, but my progress in building muscle has been stalled for a long time. Do you think my neuro problems are stymying my efforst to build more muscle? Perhaps I shouldn’t ever go to failure. I’m eager to hear your comments.
Many thanks ~ Conway…

In your case, I would certainly avoid failure completely.

Reply  |  Quote

Originally Posted By Carlos (MEYMZ)
When talking about hypertrophy, finishing a set with awful form reps lets fewer energy in the tank to keep congesting the muscle. I totally agree with your failure approach.

How does your periodization between non-failure and failure periods looks Joel. It’ll be interesting to incorporate “shocking weeks” to my workouts.

Good question; this is something we can address in another post as well.

Joel

© 2010 and Beyond. Premium Web-based Coaching, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Read our entire privacy policy  here