• Fill out the form below and I'll send you my special report, Fat Loss Secrets Exposed, absolutely free.

    :
    :
  •  

3 Scenarios – Who Burns More Fat?

Posted by Joel Marion

In yesterday’s post, we discussed several different ways to create a 300 calorie deficit:

  • Skip the morning bagel (-300 calories)
  • Walk on the treadmill for an hour and half (-300 calories)
  • Perform a very high intensity interval session (-300 calories)

In all 3 instances, the net calorie burn is -300 cals; however, as mentioned in the previous post, scenario 1 sucks, scenario 2 really sucks, and scenario 3 trumps them all–by far.

And today I want to share 3 other “scenarios” with you, with yet another lesson to be learned.

Out of the below 3 individuals, who will burn more fat and achieve better, faster results?

Scenario #1 – Subject A

  • Basal Metabolic Rate of 2,000 calories
  • No additional calories burned per day through exercise
  • Total calories burned: 2,000
  • Dietary intake: 1,300
  • Deficit: -700 calories

Scenario #1 – Subject B

  • Basal Metabolic Rate of 2,000 calories
  • Additional 200 calories burned per day through exercise
  • Total calories burned: 2,200
  • Dietary intake: 1,500
  • Deficit: -700 calories

Scenario #1 – Subject C

  • Basal Metabolic Rate of 2,000 calories
  • Additional 600 calories burned per day through exercise
  • Total calories burned: 2,600
  • Dietary intake: 1,900
  • Deficit: -700 calories

Paying careful attention to the 3 scenarios above, you see that Subject A, Subject B, and Subject C all have a Basal Metabolic Rate of 2,000 calories, and all subjects are creating a -700 caloric deficit daily.

Who will be more successful?

If fat loss were simply a mathematical phenomenon, then all three subjects would have equal success and would experience the same exact fat loss.

But, just in case you didn’t already know, there’s MUCH more to fat loss than just the numbers.

Fat loss, by and large, is largely hormonal (yes, I’m aware, that was redundant).  Indeed, a caloric deficit must be in place for fat loss to occur, but not all deficits are “equal”.

Subject A, while still being negative 700 calories, is creating a hormonal environment in the body resistance to fat loss.  Subject B is slightly better, but still far from optimal. 

Subject C is the clear winner here.  Although Subject C is creating the same exact numerical -700 calorie deficit, this individual will without a doubt experience greater fat loss and overall results.

Why?

When you decrease calorie intake, the body’s anti-starvation mechanisms are alerted and it creates a hormonal environment conducive to fat storage.

So, 1) if you need to create a calorie deficit to burn fat, but 2) you DON’T want to drastically reduce calorie intake for the reasons mentioned, what are your options?

It’s called G-flux, or energy flux.

Eat more.  Exercise more.  Lose more.

It really is THAT simple.

Simply put, the more calories you burn through exercise (versus a dietary caloric deficit), the greater your fat loss results will be.  Every.  Single. Time.

Fat burning enzymes will be elevated, the body will remain happy from a nutritional stanpoint, and let’s fact it, eating an additional 600 calories per day is a lot more livable from a psychological standpoint than attempting to create a large caloric deficit through diet alone.

My challenge to you:  Starting this week, on top of what you are already currently doing, add an additional 300 calories to your daily diet, and strive to burn an additional 300 calories via exercise.

Watch what happens.  You’ll be surprised.

Or maybe now that you’re “in the know”, you won’t be.

Questions?  Comments?  Respond below.

I’ll be checking in throughout the day and responding below, so bring on the discussion!

Talk to you in the comments section!

Joel

P.S.  In the meantime, want another EASY way to burn 8 lbs of fat without doing ANYTHING?  My buddy Jon Benson just posted a really cool tip here:

==> How to burn 8 lbs of fat without doing ANYTHING (30 second tip)

Keep rockin!

Joel

  • WHAT’S NEXT?

    • Post a comment!


    • Share this post! Share this post easily via Facebook, Twitter, Email or any social bookmarking site using the above uber widget!


    • Get FREE stuff! Get my Fat Loss Secrets Exposed report and a bunch of other free stuff when you subscribe to this blog at the top of the page!
  •  

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
72 comments - add yours
Reply  |  Quote

Yay! I’m first! Wow that was a breath of fresh air Joel. I was just struggling with this for the last several days because I’ve been doing HIIT for the last 6 months and have already lost 20lbs of fat but I’m constantly struggling diet wise because of work and travel. I took a test recently with an OMRON scale and it said my BMR was 1375, and of course that means more muscle needs building. I’m planning on increasing my weights and weight training and am concerned of over-eating/under-eating to facilitate muscle growth and accelerate fat loss.

Its a relief to know that unless I gorge myself, I won’t be over-eating as long as I train hard and well. Thanks Joel!

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel, I love reading your posts! I have learned alot since I discovered you & CYWT! Senario #3 is so much more appealing to me, so I am happy it is the better method!

Reply  |  Quote

yes i understand what you say. everyone say’s that nutrition is a main part of fat loss but what if i upped my exercise and burned say an additional 1000 calories (just for say so) would i still be burning fat if i was eating very unhealthy and drinking loads of beer. (i’m not doing this) i just want to understand how much you can burn through say doubling your routine
thanks ian

Reply  |  Quote

Hey Joel,
I love your site and agree with everything you say. I did the whole wanting to lose weight and simply eating less and doing some running but didn’t understand why I started to just look malnourished AND still flabby.
When you describe eating more calories and burning more calories via working out, it’s difficult to know how many calories you’re burning. I still feel that unless I’m jumping around I’m not burning calories. I do some weight training which I know burns calories and also does some cardio but I still don’t know what’s the best solution to burn the MOST calories, whilst still toning and losing size (I don’t want to lose weight – just be toned etc)
Thanks!
Charlotte

Reply  |  Quote

I totally agree. I tried to do too much restriction and it only worked short-term, so increasing the intensity of the workouts and eating more calories more often works best by far.

Scenario #1 – Subject A

Typical crash dieting and what runway models use on a daily basis. ;-)

Reply  |  Quote

I try to alternate weights and cardio days. I know that many of you will look down your noses at the cardio (6 mile run) element but, due to distance/pace monitor, I know that this burns c.800 calories. I don’t, however, have a clue what my high intensity weight training workout is burning.
Any advice on how to calculate or estimate this would be much appreciated…

Reply  |  Quote

What Joel says is true

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel,

I’ve been following your blogs for a few months – I have not commented before but this time I felt compelled to say a big “THANK YOU” for sharing your wonderful knowledge with us. I have an awesome trainer here in Adelaide, South Australia who is helping me get back on track after many years of illness and unhealthy weight gain. His views are very similar to yours however I find having someone else explaining something in a slightly different way very useful and of tremendous value. So thanks again and I look forward to many more of your blogs in the future.

regards
Christine

Reply  |  Quote

Awesome stuff Joel, this is one thing i really love about a lot of your methods mate, its REAL DAMN SIMPLE. This is just one of those examples, if there’s a good side to something mate, you find it, the simplicity really does motivate me most, its better than going to the trouble of planning out a diet that will push the wrong buttons in my body.

once again mate, thanks

Reply  |  Quote

Yup, works like a charm. My collegues calls me “Mr. Metabolism” cause I’m “always” eating, yet losing fat continously. The were initially coming with remarks like “trying to bulk up, hehe?” but, since going from 22% fat to 12%, those comments have kind of died out and been replaced with curious questions concerning diet and exercise.

Reply  |  Quote

Excellent post, Joel! I feel that in addition to the g-flux principles, the person will succeed in their goals in higher probability as it places less mental stress on themselves. 300 calories may be an ice-cream, an extra 2 ounces of nuts or a serving of fries. That would place less boundaries on the individual and he will think it’s do-able! But overall, I feel that a nutritional deficit placed willingly on a person’s diet, together with exercise, gives you the best results!

Reply  |  Quote

Would there not also be a difference depending on the type of exercise they are performing (ie. long, boring cardio versus weight training)?

Reply  |  Quote

Good article Joel. Actually I’m trying to implement just that because during the next two weeks I will be working in a place with a greater access to more calories but I will be walking more than usual (means more calories burned, yay). I’m still on my TT program of course, so those extra kcals will be burned, promise ;)

Reply  |  Quote

Joel, your so right! I see many clients a day and they were all going about losing fat the same way. They would eat a very low calorie diet and wonder why they were not losing any weight. I increased their calories by 300-500 and started them on a weight training circuit and boom they droped the weight and toned up.

Keep up the good work!

Reply  |  Quote

This is so true, Joel!
But I wouldn’t believe it just 6-7 years ago. It took a mind revolution to exercise and eat more … And watch my body act as a fat-burning mashine even when I do NOT exercise.

Great post.
Cheers,
Olga

Reply  |  Quote

I’ve been working with your principal you have presented here and have had surprising results, while I’ve not lost any weight (put some on in fact) i have lost fat and now have other benefits, i work a job which requires heavy lifting from time to time and have found it easier to get the work done, and had less injuries (pulled muscles etc) as well. I can’t remember when i last had back pains (something associated with my work) i can only recommend this approach to anyone who wants results.

Reply  |  Quote

Yes I totally agree, Intensity, short burst of anaerobic exercise is a clear winner anytime!

I have plenty of clients say “Ive done 400 calories on walking today” but will soon wonder why the pounds wont shift, the answer is intensity.

Keep up the good work bro!
Im working on a ebook inspired by the knowledge shared here and many other great sites.

B

Reply  |  Quote

Hey Joel, in Eat Stop Eat, Brad included a study that proved cardio did not seem very beneficial as it should be when doing 24h fasts. I fast 24h twice a week, 3 days in between. I also weight train properly (deadlifts, squats, bla bla bla) 2-3 times a week. But I do ZERO cardio. Am I doing things right? Should I add cardio in? Your reply will be appreciated.

Reply  |  Quote

Finally I got it I have been killing myself cutting caloric intake with zero results. I now understand the concept and looking forward to changing things this week. I have remained strong lifting weights interval style but now will add interval tread work and MMA classes to up my caloric burn and EAT MORE!!!
Thanks,
Stan

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel,

I do believe the theory of eat more (within reason) , exercise more (within reason), and you will burn fat and accomplish great gains (Not weight gain of course).
I am troubled, however, by my scenario a little. I am a 120#, 49yr , 5’3 female. I really just would like to drop a few pounds of body fat…..basically I am very fit and have good muscular definition, little body anywhere except for a small amount of abdominal fat that is being very stubborn. I also have diastasis recti from my 2 wonderful children so that doesn’t help with the slight protrusion of my abdomen (it really is not that huge but bugs me to death).

Anyway…..I exercise intensely 5-6 days/wk…..weight train, interval train, and actually teach an intense weight training/ cardio interval class twice a week.
My BMR without exercise factored is approx 1230, add exercise it’s about 1900. I consume roughly 1500 -1600 . Nothing budges. I’m trying to get in the habit of consuming a larger amount of cals once a week to trick my body a bit. It is tough for me to do mentally. Trust me my diet is pretty clean 90% of the time. If I stray on some indulgent it is still within clean eating guidelines being made from all natural products, not packaged….homemade items.

Any suggestions here??? Are my cals appropriate? Oh by the way my carb intake mostly comes from lots of veggies, 2 servings of fruit a day and a very small amount of complex carbs coming from Ezekiel bread, quinoa, some beans, brown rice only occaisionally, oatmeal and barley on occaision.

So there ya have it…..would love a little input….

Reply  |  Quote

Wow, that is information that no one else seems to be talking about. I am down 24 pounds and 2 pant sizes in the past 2 months, but I have not been putting my emphasis on the exercise versus the calorie deficit. The way you presented that information made me plan to really change how I have been approaching my goals. I will continue to eat as I have, but add more calories. I will also be adding additional short, intense workouts to my day so I am getting bursts of fat loss hormones through the day. My office has a program where we can add 30 minutes to our 30 minute lunch if it is used for exercise. We get paid for the time and get a mid day workout too. I will be adding a 15 minute workout first thing in the morning and one after work too to keep things really going. Thanks for the great information.

Reply  |  Quote

Hi Joel. Just a question….while I totally agree with your comments above, I am somewhat confused. I have just started your CYWT program and based on using the caloric guidelines, I am ‘allowed’ 1156 calories per day on a LOW CARB day. Now, I’m a 5’9, 162 pound woman. For me to workout like I do and burn about 600 calories, I just cannot do it on such few calories. I’m STARVING, which does not sound like your philosophy at all. Am I doing something wrong?

Reply  |  Quote

These reminders of how effective your plan is are Xtremely helpful! Keep em coming. I lost 20 lbs in the “holiday” CYWT plan and keep losing (so only another 60 or so to go!). The interval exercise plan seems to be the real key, and it is very easy to keep going back to it — I’m not even tempted to skip it, since the results are so dramatic. I can run for the first time in 20 years! Thanks and thanks again!

Reply  |  Quote

I purchased the Holiday Edition of CYWT and I have been following it religiously since Thanksgiving. I am not counting calories, but rather using portions and sticking very strictly to the correct food types. Baby carrots have become my friend! ( I am 54 and I am 6’2″ and started at 274 pounds.) So far I have lost 17 pounds, which is good, but not spectacular. To be honest, I use a hybrid exercise plan. I work out quite a bit more than specified in CYWT. I work with a trainer one day per week and he absolutely kicks my behind. On the other days, I am doing P90X (some of which can be even tougher than the trainer’s workout). However, I am doing this with my wife and she goes to the trainer twice a week, so I fill in with a round of interval training on the elliptical on the second day she is at the trainer. There are also some days when she can’t work out, so again, I fill in with the elliptical or Cardio X so she and I can remain synched on the main P90X program. I am averaging about one rest day per week with all of this activity. I don’t know how accurate the calorie counting mechanism on the elliptical is, but an average workout for me says that I burn about 1075 calories. So, you can see that I work pretty hard. I am not sure that I could realistically add another 300 calories of exercise per day.

I have been overweight my entire life and have been fighting this battle for a long time via many different programs (including BFL). I am always successful losing weight, but never seem to be able to maintain it. That is what I like about CYWT. It looks like a much more sustainable plan for long-term success. As I said, I am somewhat satisfied with my progress, but I sure would like to move faster given how hard I am working. In my past struggles, I have used very strict calorie counting and that has been quite successful, but it is tedious and annoying, so that is why I chose the portion approach for CYWT. Perhaps I need to go back to counting calories. Also, I think I may be hurting myself on cheat days. I try to follow your advice of eating what I want, but not being abusive by keeping quantities reasonable, etc. However, it is not unusual for me to gain 3-4 pounds after cheat day and then spend four days of the next week knocking that off before I can return to making more progress. I get the feeling that I am very sensitive to the combination of fat and sugar. Any suggestions for accelerating fat loss even more?

Thanks for all of your information and encouragement. Bob

Reply  |  Quote

Good post, Joel.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2010 and Beyond. Premium Web-based Coaching, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Read our entire privacy policy  here